Head-to-Head Analysis

Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni vs Classic Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni

Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Classic Potato Chips

Classic Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0g
2.5g
Fat
0g
13.3g
Protein
0g
3.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni and Classic Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni is the more energy-dense option here, packing 367 more calories per 100g than Classic Potato Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Classic Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classic Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni offers a protein boost with 13.33g per 100g, outperforming Classic Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni or Classic Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni has 367 calories, while Classic Potato Chips has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni vegan?

No, Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pasta sides cheesey bacon macaroni and Classic Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 367 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.