Head-to-Head Analysis

Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders vs Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders

Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.9g
Fat
35.7g
22g
Protein
7.1g
0.1g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders and Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders is the clear winner. With 439 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders offers a protein boost with 22g per 100g, outperforming Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders or Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders has 97 calories, while Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders vegan?

No, Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pasture raised Non GMO boneless chicken tenders and Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 439 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.