Head-to-Head Analysis

Peppermint Pretzel Slims vs Cinnamon oat flapjack & waffle mix, cinnamon oat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Peppermint Pretzel Slims

Peppermint Pretzel Slims

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cinnamon oat flapjack & waffle mix, cinnamon oat

Cinnamon oat flapjack & waffle mix, cinnamon oat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
467 kcal
Energy
358 kcal
43.3g
Sugars
17g
16.7g
Fat
2.8g
6.7g
Protein
26.4g
1g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Peppermint Pretzel Slims and Cinnamon oat flapjack & waffle mix, cinnamon oat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Peppermint Pretzel Slims is the more energy-dense option here, packing 109 more calories per 100g than Cinnamon oat flapjack & waffle mix, cinnamon oat. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Peppermint Pretzel Slims contains significantly more sugar (43.3g) compared to the milder Cinnamon oat flapjack & waffle mix, cinnamon oat (17g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cinnamon oat flapjack & waffle mix, cinnamon oat is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Peppermint Pretzel Slims or Cinnamon oat flapjack & waffle mix, cinnamon oat?

It depends on your goals. Peppermint Pretzel Slims has 467 calories, while Cinnamon oat flapjack & waffle mix, cinnamon oat has 358 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Peppermint Pretzel Slims vegan?

No, Peppermint Pretzel Slims is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Peppermint Pretzel Slims and Cinnamon oat flapjack & waffle mix, cinnamon oat?

There is a difference of 109 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.