Head-to-Head Analysis

PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP vs Milk chocolate & caramel candy, milk chocolate & caramel

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP

PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Milk chocolate & caramel candy, milk chocolate & caramel

Milk chocolate & caramel candy, milk chocolate & caramel

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
221.4 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0.8g
Sugars
53.1g
12.2g
Fat
28.1g
8.4g
Protein
6.3g
1.1g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP and Milk chocolate & caramel candy, milk chocolate & caramel side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP is the clear winner. With 279 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP takes the lead with only 0.763358778625954g of sugar per 100g, whereas Milk chocolate & caramel candy, milk chocolate & caramel contains 53.12g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP offers a protein boost with 8.3969465648855g per 100g, outperforming Milk chocolate & caramel candy, milk chocolate & caramel in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP or Milk chocolate & caramel candy, milk chocolate & caramel?

PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP vegan?

No, PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP and Milk chocolate & caramel candy, milk chocolate & caramel?

There is a difference of 279 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.