Head-to-Head Analysis

PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP vs Triscuit Cracker

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP

PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Triscuit Cracker

Triscuit Cracker

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
221.4 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
0.8g
Sugars
0g
12.2g
Fat
12.5g
8.4g
Protein
10.7g
1.1g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP and Triscuit Cracker side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP is the clear winner. With 208 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP or Triscuit Cracker?

It depends on your goals. PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP has 221.374045801527 calories, while Triscuit Cracker has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP vegan?

No, PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between PESTO CHICKEN SALAD WRAP and Triscuit Cracker?

There is a difference of 208 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.