Head-to-Head Analysis

Peter rabit vs Cashew

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Peter rabit

Peter rabit

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cashew

Cashew

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
61.9 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
10.6g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
50g
0.9g
Protein
17.9g
0g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Peter rabit and Cashew side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Peter rabit is the clear winner. With 509 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Peter rabit contains significantly more sugar (10.619469026549g) compared to the milder Cashew (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cashew is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Peter rabit or Cashew?

It depends on your goals. Peter rabit has 61.946902654867 calories, while Cashew has 571.42857142857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Peter rabit vegan?

No, Peter rabit is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Peter rabit and Cashew?

There is a difference of 509 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.