Head-to-Head Analysis

Peter rabit vs Sliced Beets

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Peter rabit

Peter rabit

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sliced Beets

Sliced Beets

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
61.9 kcal
Energy
33 kcal
10.6g
Sugars
5.7g
0g
Fat
0g
0.9g
Protein
0.8g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Peter rabit and Sliced Beets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Peter rabit is the more energy-dense option here, packing 29 more calories per 100g than Sliced Beets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Peter rabit contains significantly more sugar (10.619469026549g) compared to the milder Sliced Beets (5.69g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sliced Beets is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Peter rabit or Sliced Beets?

It depends on your goals. Peter rabit has 61.946902654867 calories, while Sliced Beets has 33 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Peter rabit vegan?

No, Peter rabit is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Peter rabit and Sliced Beets?

There is a difference of 29 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.