Head-to-Head Analysis

Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot vs Scallion French-Style Soft Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot

Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Scallion French-Style Soft Cheese

Scallion French-Style Soft Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
100 kcal
Energy
321.4 kcal
11.7g
Sugars
0g
1.7g
Fat
25g
6.7g
Protein
10.7g
0.1g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot and Scallion French-Style Soft Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot is the clear winner. With 221 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot contains significantly more sugar (11.7g) compared to the milder Scallion French-Style Soft Cheese (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Scallion French-Style Soft Cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot or Scallion French-Style Soft Cheese?

It depends on your goals. Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot has 100 calories, while Scallion French-Style Soft Cheese has 321.4286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot vegan?

No, Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Petit Suisse Montebourg with fruits Apricot and Scallion French-Style Soft Cheese?

There is a difference of 221 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.