Head-to-Head Analysis

Petite Sponge Cake Mix vs California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Petite Sponge Cake Mix

Petite Sponge Cake Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium

California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
393 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
41g
Sugars
0g
11.5g
Fat
10g
3.3g
Protein
0.9g
1.1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Petite Sponge Cake Mix and California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Petite Sponge Cake Mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 293 more calories per 100g than California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Petite Sponge Cake Mix contains significantly more sugar (41g) compared to the milder California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Petite Sponge Cake Mix offers a protein boost with 3.28g per 100g, outperforming California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Petite Sponge Cake Mix or California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium?

It depends on your goals. Petite Sponge Cake Mix has 393 calories, while California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Petite Sponge Cake Mix vegan?

No, Petite Sponge Cake Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Petite Sponge Cake Mix and California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium?

There is a difference of 293 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.