Head-to-Head Analysis

Philly Steak Rolls vs Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Philly Steak Rolls

Philly Steak Rolls

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies

Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
295.8 kcal
Energy
24 kcal
8.5g
Sugars
2.4g
2.8g
Fat
0g
8.5g
Protein
0.8g
1.5g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Philly Steak Rolls and Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Philly Steak Rolls is the more energy-dense option here, packing 272 more calories per 100g than Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Philly Steak Rolls contains significantly more sugar (8.45g) compared to the milder Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies (2.38g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Philly Steak Rolls offers a protein boost with 8.45g per 100g, outperforming Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Philly Steak Rolls or Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies?

It depends on your goals. Philly Steak Rolls has 295.77 calories, while Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies has 24 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Philly Steak Rolls vegan?

No, Philly Steak Rolls is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Philly Steak Rolls and Petite diced tomatoes with green chilies?

There is a difference of 272 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.