Picon california sweet roll vs Classic
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Picon california sweet roll
Classic
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Picon california sweet roll and Classic side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Picon california sweet roll is the more energy-dense option here, packing 192 more calories per 100g than Classic. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Picon california sweet roll contains significantly more sugar (16.9g) compared to the milder Classic (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classic is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Picon california sweet roll offers a protein boost with 7.04g per 100g, outperforming Classic in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Picon california sweet roll or Classic?
It depends on your goals. Picon california sweet roll has 352 calories, while Classic has 160 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Picon california sweet roll vegan?
No, Picon california sweet roll is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Picon california sweet roll and Classic?
There is a difference of 192 calories per 100g between the two products.
