Head-to-Head Analysis

Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans vs Double Chocolate Premium Brownie Mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans

Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Double Chocolate Premium Brownie Mix

Double Chocolate Premium Brownie Mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
347.8 kcal
Energy
439 kcal
23.9g
Sugars
43.9g
15.2g
Fat
19.5g
4.3g
Protein
4.9g
1.8g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans and Double Chocolate Premium Brownie Mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans is the clear winner. With 91 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans takes the lead with only 23.913g of sugar per 100g, whereas Double Chocolate Premium Brownie Mix contains 43.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans or Double Chocolate Premium Brownie Mix?

Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans vegan?

No, Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pillsbury flaky supreme cinnamon rolls with icing cans and Double Chocolate Premium Brownie Mix?

There is a difference of 91 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.