Head-to-Head Analysis

Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets vs Chunk light tuna in water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets

Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chunk light tuna in water

Chunk light tuna in water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
116 kcal
Energy
70.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
4g
Fat
1.1g
19.6g
Protein
14.1g
0.4g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets and Chunk light tuna in water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 46 more calories per 100g than Chunk light tuna in water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets offers a protein boost with 19.6g per 100g, outperforming Chunk light tuna in water in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets or Chunk light tuna in water?

It depends on your goals. Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets has 116 calories, while Chunk light tuna in water has 70.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets vegan?

No, Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets and Chunk light tuna in water?

There is a difference of 46 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.