Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets vs Fish Fillets
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets
Fish Fillets
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets and Fish Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets is the clear winner. With 88 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fish Fillets contains 2.78g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets offers a protein boost with 19.6g per 100g, outperforming Fish Fillets in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets or Fish Fillets?
Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets vegan?
No, Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets and Fish Fillets?
There is a difference of 88 calories per 100g between the two products.
