Head-to-Head Analysis

Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells vs Organic Bartlett Pears

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells

Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Bartlett Pears

Organic Bartlett Pears

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
607 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
0g
46.4g
Fat
0g
21.4g
Protein
0g
2.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells and Organic Bartlett Pears side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells is the more energy-dense option here, packing 607 more calories per 100g than Organic Bartlett Pears. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells contains significantly more sugar (7.14g) compared to the milder Organic Bartlett Pears (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Bartlett Pears is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells offers a protein boost with 21.4g per 100g, outperforming Organic Bartlett Pears in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells or Organic Bartlett Pears?

It depends on your goals. Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells has 607 calories, while Organic Bartlett Pears has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells vegan?

No, Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells and Organic Bartlett Pears?

There is a difference of 607 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.