Head-to-Head Analysis

Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells vs Tea Tasting Assortment

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells

Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tea Tasting Assortment

Tea Tasting Assortment

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
607 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
10.7g
Sugars
0g
46.4g
Fat
0g
21.4g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells and Tea Tasting Assortment side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells is the more energy-dense option here, packing 607 more calories per 100g than Tea Tasting Assortment. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells contains significantly more sugar (10.7g) compared to the milder Tea Tasting Assortment (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tea Tasting Assortment is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells offers a protein boost with 21.4g per 100g, outperforming Tea Tasting Assortment in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells or Tea Tasting Assortment?

It depends on your goals. Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells has 607 calories, while Tea Tasting Assortment has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells vegan?

No, Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pistachios Honey Roasted No Shells and Tea Tasting Assortment?

There is a difference of 607 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.