Head-to-Head Analysis

Pistachios No Shells Multipack vs multigrain rice crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pistachios No Shells Multipack

Pistachios No Shells Multipack

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of multigrain rice crackers

multigrain rice crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
433.3 kcal
9.5g
Sugars
3.3g
47.6g
Fat
10g
23.8g
Protein
6.7g
1.3g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pistachios No Shells Multipack and multigrain rice crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pistachios No Shells Multipack is the more energy-dense option here, packing 138 more calories per 100g than multigrain rice crackers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pistachios No Shells Multipack contains significantly more sugar (9.52g) compared to the milder multigrain rice crackers (3.3333333333333g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, multigrain rice crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Pistachios No Shells Multipack offers a protein boost with 23.8g per 100g, outperforming multigrain rice crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pistachios No Shells Multipack or multigrain rice crackers?

It depends on your goals. Pistachios No Shells Multipack has 571 calories, while multigrain rice crackers has 433.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pistachios No Shells Multipack vegan?

No, Pistachios No Shells Multipack is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pistachios No Shells Multipack and multigrain rice crackers?

There is a difference of 138 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.