Head-to-Head Analysis

Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita vs Salisbury Steak with Macaroni & Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita

Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salisbury Steak with Macaroni & Cheese

Salisbury Steak with Macaroni & Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
155 kcal
Energy
92.9 kcal
2.8g
Sugars
1.1g
7g
Fat
2.2g
8.5g
Protein
8.2g
0.8g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita and Salisbury Steak with Macaroni & Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita is the more energy-dense option here, packing 62 more calories per 100g than Salisbury Steak with Macaroni & Cheese. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita contains significantly more sugar (2.82g) compared to the milder Salisbury Steak with Macaroni & Cheese (1.12g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salisbury Steak with Macaroni & Cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita or Salisbury Steak with Macaroni & Cheese?

It depends on your goals. Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita has 155 calories, while Salisbury Steak with Macaroni & Cheese has 92.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita vegan?

No, Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Plant-Based Burrito Chik'N Fajita and Salisbury Steak with Macaroni & Cheese?

There is a difference of 62 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.