Head-to-Head Analysis

Plant-Based F'sh Filets vs Plant-Based Sausage Kielbasa

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Plant-Based F'sh Filets

Plant-Based F'sh Filets

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Plant-Based Sausage Kielbasa

Plant-Based Sausage Kielbasa

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
250 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.1g
0g
Fat
13g
0g
Protein
25g
0g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Plant-Based F'sh Filets and Plant-Based Sausage Kielbasa side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Plant-Based F'sh Filets is the clear winner. With 50 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Plant-Based F'sh Filets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Plant-Based Sausage Kielbasa contains 1.09g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Plant-Based F'sh Filets or Plant-Based Sausage Kielbasa?

Plant-Based F'sh Filets appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Plant-Based F'sh Filets vegan?

No, Plant-Based F'sh Filets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Plant-Based F'sh Filets and Plant-Based Sausage Kielbasa?

There is a difference of 50 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.