Head-to-Head Analysis

Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style vs Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style

Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage

Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
232.1 kcal
Energy
147 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
4.4g
7.1g
Fat
4.4g
28.6g
Protein
20.6g
4.2g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style and Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style is the more energy-dense option here, packing 85 more calories per 100g than Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style offers a protein boost with 28.571428571429g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style or Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage?

It depends on your goals. Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style has 232.14285714286 calories, while Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage has 147 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style vegan?

No, Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style and Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage?

There is a difference of 85 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.