Head-to-Head Analysis

Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini vs jasmine rice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini

Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of jasmine rice

jasmine rice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
364 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
0g
25.5g
Protein
5g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini and jasmine rice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini is the more energy-dense option here, packing 364 more calories per 100g than jasmine rice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini contains significantly more sugar (1.82g) compared to the milder jasmine rice (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, jasmine rice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini offers a protein boost with 25.5g per 100g, outperforming jasmine rice in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini or jasmine rice?

It depends on your goals. Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini has 364 calories, while jasmine rice has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini vegan?

No, Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Plant-Based Protein Pasta: Red Lentil Rotini and jasmine rice?

There is a difference of 364 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.