Head-to-Head Analysis

planters Duo nut duos 6 months vs Bonbon Boom, Bubble Gum Pops, Sour

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of planters Duo nut duos 6 months

planters Duo nut duos 6 months

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Bonbon Boom, Bubble Gum Pops, Sour

Bonbon Boom, Bubble Gum Pops, Sour

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
561 kcal
Energy
353 kcal
10.5g
Sugars
76.5g
40.4g
Fat
0g
15.8g
Protein
0g
1.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing planters Duo nut duos 6 months and Bonbon Boom, Bubble Gum Pops, Sour side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

planters Duo nut duos 6 months is the more energy-dense option here, packing 208 more calories per 100g than Bonbon Boom, Bubble Gum Pops, Sour. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, planters Duo nut duos 6 months takes the lead with only 10.5g of sugar per 100g, whereas Bonbon Boom, Bubble Gum Pops, Sour contains 76.47g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? planters Duo nut duos 6 months offers a protein boost with 15.8g per 100g, outperforming Bonbon Boom, Bubble Gum Pops, Sour in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: planters Duo nut duos 6 months or Bonbon Boom, Bubble Gum Pops, Sour?

It depends on your goals. planters Duo nut duos 6 months has 561 calories, while Bonbon Boom, Bubble Gum Pops, Sour has 353 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is planters Duo nut duos 6 months vegan?

No, planters Duo nut duos 6 months is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between planters Duo nut duos 6 months and Bonbon Boom, Bubble Gum Pops, Sour?

There is a difference of 208 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.