Polar boneless and skinless salmon fillets vs Infused with tuna
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Polar boneless and skinless salmon fillets
Infused with tuna
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Polar boneless and skinless salmon fillets and Infused with tuna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Polar boneless and skinless salmon fillets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 41 more calories per 100g than Infused with tuna. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Polar boneless and skinless salmon fillets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Infused with tuna contains 2.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Polar boneless and skinless salmon fillets or Infused with tuna?
It depends on your goals. Polar boneless and skinless salmon fillets has 141 calories, while Infused with tuna has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Polar boneless and skinless salmon fillets vegan?
No, Polar boneless and skinless salmon fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Polar boneless and skinless salmon fillets and Infused with tuna?
There is a difference of 41 calories per 100g between the two products.
