Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos vs Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos
Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos and Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos is the clear winner. With 126 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos contains significantly more sugar (1.79g) compared to the milder Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos or Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives?
It depends on your goals. Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos has 107 calories, while Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 233.333333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos vegan?
No, Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Pollo Con Chile Verde Street Tacos and Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives?
There is a difference of 126 calories per 100g between the two products.
