Head-to-Head Analysis

Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate vs Mint Chocolate Chip High Protein Baked Bar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate

Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mint Chocolate Chip High Protein Baked Bar

Mint Chocolate Chip High Protein Baked Bar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
168.6 kcal
Energy
413 kcal
20g
Sugars
6.5g
6.9g
Fat
17.4g
3.1g
Protein
34.8g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate and Mint Chocolate Chip High Protein Baked Bar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate is the clear winner. With 244 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Mint Chocolate Chip High Protein Baked Bar (6.52g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mint Chocolate Chip High Protein Baked Bar is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate or Mint Chocolate Chip High Protein Baked Bar?

It depends on your goals. Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate has 168.571428571429 calories, while Mint Chocolate Chip High Protein Baked Bar has 413 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate vegan?

No, Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Polos sabor nata y sabor chocolate and Mint Chocolate Chip High Protein Baked Bar?

There is a difference of 244 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.