Head-to-Head Analysis

Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce vs Near east rice pilaf mix chicken

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce

Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Near east rice pilaf mix chicken

Near east rice pilaf mix chicken

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
92 kcal
Energy
339.3 kcal
6.2g
Sugars
1.8g
0.8g
Fat
0.9g
4.6g
Protein
8.9g
0.8g
Salt
3.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce and Near east rice pilaf mix chicken side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce is the clear winner. With 247 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce contains significantly more sugar (6.15g) compared to the milder Near east rice pilaf mix chicken (1.79g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Near east rice pilaf mix chicken is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce or Near east rice pilaf mix chicken?

It depends on your goals. Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce has 92 calories, while Near east rice pilaf mix chicken has 339.29 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce vegan?

No, Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pork and beans in tomato sauce, tomato sauce and Near east rice pilaf mix chicken?

There is a difference of 247 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.