Head-to-Head Analysis

Pork Gyoza Potstickers vs Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pork Gyoza Potstickers

Pork Gyoza Potstickers

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup

Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
164 kcal
Energy
73.5 kcal
2.1g
Sugars
0g
4.3g
Fat
0.2g
7.1g
Protein
2.5g
1.2g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pork Gyoza Potstickers and Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pork Gyoza Potstickers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 91 more calories per 100g than Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pork Gyoza Potstickers contains significantly more sugar (2.14g) compared to the milder Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Pork Gyoza Potstickers offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pork Gyoza Potstickers or Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup?

It depends on your goals. Pork Gyoza Potstickers has 164 calories, while Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup has 73.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pork Gyoza Potstickers vegan?

No, Pork Gyoza Potstickers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pork Gyoza Potstickers and Garden Vegetable Lower Sodium Soup?

There is a difference of 91 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.