Head-to-Head Analysis

Pork Potstickers vs Bhatha Kani

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pork Potstickers

Pork Potstickers

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Bhatha Kani

Bhatha Kani

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
167 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
5.6g
Sugars
0g
4.4g
Fat
24g
5.6g
Protein
16g
1.6g
Salt
2.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pork Potstickers and Bhatha Kani side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pork Potstickers is the clear winner. With 333 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pork Potstickers contains significantly more sugar (5.56g) compared to the milder Bhatha Kani (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Bhatha Kani is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pork Potstickers or Bhatha Kani?

It depends on your goals. Pork Potstickers has 167 calories, while Bhatha Kani has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pork Potstickers vegan?

No, Pork Potstickers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pork Potstickers and Bhatha Kani?

There is a difference of 333 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.