Head-to-Head Analysis

Pork Tenderloin vs Sweet Fish

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Pork Tenderloin

Pork Tenderloin

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Fish

Sweet Fish

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
116 kcal
Energy
260 kcal
0g
Sugars
6g
3.6g
Fat
0g
20.5g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pork Tenderloin and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pork Tenderloin is the clear winner. With 144 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Pork Tenderloin takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Fish contains 6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Pork Tenderloin offers a protein boost with 20.5g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Fish in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pork Tenderloin or Sweet Fish?

Pork Tenderloin appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Pork Tenderloin vegan?

No, Pork Tenderloin is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pork Tenderloin and Sweet Fish?

There is a difference of 144 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.