Head-to-Head Analysis

Pork Tocino vs Thinaddictives pistachio

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Pork Tocino

Pork Tocino

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Thinaddictives pistachio

Thinaddictives pistachio

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
291 kcal
Energy
476 kcal
21.2g
Sugars
23.8g
15.9g
Fat
19g
15.9g
Protein
19g
0.8g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pork Tocino and Thinaddictives pistachio side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pork Tocino is the clear winner. With 185 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Pork Tocino takes the lead with only 21.2g of sugar per 100g, whereas Thinaddictives pistachio contains 23.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pork Tocino or Thinaddictives pistachio?

Pork Tocino appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Pork Tocino vegan?

No, Pork Tocino is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pork Tocino and Thinaddictives pistachio?

There is a difference of 185 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.