Head-to-Head Analysis

Port wine cheese ball vs Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Port wine cheese ball

Port wine cheese ball

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese

Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321.4 kcal
Energy
214.3 kcal
14.3g
Sugars
0g
21.4g
Fat
7.1g
17.9g
Protein
32.1g
1.6g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Port wine cheese ball and Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Port wine cheese ball is the more energy-dense option here, packing 107 more calories per 100g than Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Port wine cheese ball contains significantly more sugar (14.285714285714g) compared to the milder Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Port wine cheese ball or Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese?

It depends on your goals. Port wine cheese ball has 321.42857142857 calories, while Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese has 214.29 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Port wine cheese ball vegan?

No, Port wine cheese ball is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Port wine cheese ball and Sharp Extra Light Natural Vermont Cheddar Cheese?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.