Head-to-Head Analysis

Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC vs HALVES & PIECES CASHEWS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC

Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of HALVES & PIECES CASHEWS

HALVES & PIECES CASHEWS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
56.7g
Sugars
3.6g
6.7g
Fat
46.4g
6.7g
Protein
17.9g
0.3g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC and HALVES & PIECES CASHEWS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC is the clear winner. With 238 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC contains significantly more sugar (56.67g) compared to the milder HALVES & PIECES CASHEWS (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, HALVES & PIECES CASHEWS is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC or HALVES & PIECES CASHEWS?

It depends on your goals. Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC has 333 calories, while HALVES & PIECES CASHEWS has 571.43 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC vegan?

No, Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pour Over Latte PREMIUM VIETNAMESE COFFEE CLASSIC and HALVES & PIECES CASHEWS?

There is a difference of 238 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.