Head-to-Head Analysis

Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz vs Fig fruit chewy cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz

Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fig fruit chewy cookies

Fig fruit chewy cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
438 kcal
Energy
344.8 kcal
0g
Sugars
41.4g
12.5g
Fat
6.9g
6.3g
Protein
3.4g
2g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz and Fig fruit chewy cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz is the more energy-dense option here, packing 93 more calories per 100g than Fig fruit chewy cookies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fig fruit chewy cookies contains 41.379310344828g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz offers a protein boost with 6.25g per 100g, outperforming Fig fruit chewy cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz or Fig fruit chewy cookies?

It depends on your goals. Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz has 438 calories, while Fig fruit chewy cookies has 344.8275862069 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz vegan?

No, Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Premium crackers whole grain 1x16.96 oz and Fig fruit chewy cookies?

There is a difference of 93 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.