Head-to-Head Analysis

Premium Quality Pasta Sauce vs Hatch Valley Green Chile Tomatillo, Garlic & Lime Salsa

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Premium Quality Pasta Sauce

Premium Quality Pasta Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Hatch Valley Green Chile Tomatillo, Garlic & Lime Salsa

Hatch Valley Green Chile Tomatillo, Garlic & Lime Salsa

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
351 kcal
Energy
33.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.3g
1.8g
Fat
0g
1.8g
Protein
3.3g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Premium Quality Pasta Sauce and Hatch Valley Green Chile Tomatillo, Garlic & Lime Salsa side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Premium Quality Pasta Sauce is the more energy-dense option here, packing 318 more calories per 100g than Hatch Valley Green Chile Tomatillo, Garlic & Lime Salsa. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Premium Quality Pasta Sauce takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Hatch Valley Green Chile Tomatillo, Garlic & Lime Salsa contains 3.3333333333333g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Premium Quality Pasta Sauce or Hatch Valley Green Chile Tomatillo, Garlic & Lime Salsa?

It depends on your goals. Premium Quality Pasta Sauce has 351 calories, while Hatch Valley Green Chile Tomatillo, Garlic & Lime Salsa has 33.333333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Premium Quality Pasta Sauce vegan?

No, Premium Quality Pasta Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Premium Quality Pasta Sauce and Hatch Valley Green Chile Tomatillo, Garlic & Lime Salsa?

There is a difference of 318 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.