Head-to-Head Analysis

Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel vs Ridged Potato Chips Sour Cream and Onion

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel

Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Ridged Potato Chips Sour Cream and Onion

Ridged Potato Chips Sour Cream and Onion

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
2.5g
Sugars
3.6g
15g
Fat
32.1g
37.5g
Protein
7.1g
1.3g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel and Ridged Potato Chips Sour Cream and Onion side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel is the clear winner. With 136 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel takes the lead with only 2.5g of sugar per 100g, whereas Ridged Potato Chips Sour Cream and Onion contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel offers a protein boost with 37.5g per 100g, outperforming Ridged Potato Chips Sour Cream and Onion in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel or Ridged Potato Chips Sour Cream and Onion?

Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel vegan?

No, Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Protein Bat-Chocolate Salted Caramel and Ridged Potato Chips Sour Cream and Onion?

There is a difference of 136 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.