Head-to-Head Analysis

Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes vs Potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes

Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Potato chips

Potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
245 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
20.6g
Sugars
7.1g
8.8g
Fat
32.1g
9.8g
Protein
7.1g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes and Potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes is the clear winner. With 291 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes contains significantly more sugar (20.6g) compared to the milder Potato chips (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes offers a protein boost with 9.8g per 100g, outperforming Potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes or Potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes has 245 calories, while Potato chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes vegan?

No, Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Protien Snack Sized Blueberry Filled Pancakes and Potato chips?

There is a difference of 291 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.