Head-to-Head Analysis

Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold vs Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold

Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean

Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
165 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
0g
Sugars
14.3g
9.4g
Fat
46.4g
16.5g
Protein
14.3g
0.4g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold and Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold is the clear winner. With 406 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean contains 14.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold offers a protein boost with 16.5g per 100g, outperforming Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold or Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean?

Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold vegan?

No, Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pulled Rotisserie Chicken Cold and Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean?

There is a difference of 406 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.