Head-to-Head Analysis

Pumpkin Spice Latte vs Flake thin & crispy sweet heat barbecue flavored potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pumpkin Spice Latte

Pumpkin Spice Latte

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Flake thin & crispy sweet heat barbecue flavored potato chips

Flake thin & crispy sweet heat barbecue flavored potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
267 kcal
Energy
530 kcal
40g
Sugars
7.1g
10g
Fat
28.3g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0.1g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pumpkin Spice Latte and Flake thin & crispy sweet heat barbecue flavored potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pumpkin Spice Latte is the clear winner. With 263 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pumpkin Spice Latte contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Flake thin & crispy sweet heat barbecue flavored potato chips (7.0671378091873g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Flake thin & crispy sweet heat barbecue flavored potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pumpkin Spice Latte or Flake thin & crispy sweet heat barbecue flavored potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Pumpkin Spice Latte has 267 calories, while Flake thin & crispy sweet heat barbecue flavored potato chips has 530.03533568905 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pumpkin Spice Latte vegan?

No, Pumpkin Spice Latte is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pumpkin Spice Latte and Flake thin & crispy sweet heat barbecue flavored potato chips?

There is a difference of 263 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.