Head-to-Head Analysis

Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles vs Breakfast Biscuits Hazelnuts Carob

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles

Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Breakfast Biscuits Hazelnuts Carob

Breakfast Biscuits Hazelnuts Carob

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
611 kcal
Energy
180 kcal
38.9g
Sugars
6g
47.2g
Fat
8g
5.6g
Protein
5g
0.1g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles and Breakfast Biscuits Hazelnuts Carob side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles is the more energy-dense option here, packing 431 more calories per 100g than Breakfast Biscuits Hazelnuts Carob. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles contains significantly more sugar (38.9g) compared to the milder Breakfast Biscuits Hazelnuts Carob (6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Breakfast Biscuits Hazelnuts Carob is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles or Breakfast Biscuits Hazelnuts Carob?

It depends on your goals. Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles has 611 calories, while Breakfast Biscuits Hazelnuts Carob has 180 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles vegan?

No, Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pumpkin Spice Milk Chocolate Truffles and Breakfast Biscuits Hazelnuts Carob?

There is a difference of 431 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.