Head-to-Head Analysis

Pumpkin Spice Special K vs HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pumpkin Spice Special K

Pumpkin Spice Special K

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit

HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
366 kcal
Energy
20 kcal
26.8g
Sugars
3.8g
3.7g
Fat
0g
7.3g
Protein
0.2g
1.6g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pumpkin Spice Special K and HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pumpkin Spice Special K is the more energy-dense option here, packing 346 more calories per 100g than HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pumpkin Spice Special K contains significantly more sugar (26.8g) compared to the milder HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit (3.78g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Pumpkin Spice Special K offers a protein boost with 7.32g per 100g, outperforming HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pumpkin Spice Special K or HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit?

It depends on your goals. Pumpkin Spice Special K has 366 calories, while HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit has 20 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pumpkin Spice Special K vegan?

No, Pumpkin Spice Special K is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pumpkin Spice Special K and HYDRATION Watermelon Dragon Fruit?

There is a difference of 346 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.