Head-to-Head Analysis

Pumpkin Walnut Blonde vs Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Pumpkin Walnut Blonde

Pumpkin Walnut Blonde

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored

Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
391 kcal
Energy
330 kcal
30.4g
Sugars
36.7g
21.7g
Fat
1.7g
13g
Protein
3.3g
0.4g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pumpkin Walnut Blonde and Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pumpkin Walnut Blonde is the more energy-dense option here, packing 61 more calories per 100g than Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Pumpkin Walnut Blonde takes the lead with only 30.4g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored contains 36.67g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Pumpkin Walnut Blonde offers a protein boost with 13g per 100g, outperforming Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pumpkin Walnut Blonde or Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored?

It depends on your goals. Pumpkin Walnut Blonde has 391 calories, while Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored has 330 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pumpkin Walnut Blonde vegan?

No, Pumpkin Walnut Blonde is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pumpkin Walnut Blonde and Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored?

There is a difference of 61 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.