Head-to-Head Analysis

Pure Cane Sugar vs Orville Redenbacher's Butter Popcorn, 3.29 Ounce Classic Bag, 3.3 OZ

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pure Cane Sugar

Pure Cane Sugar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Orville Redenbacher's Butter Popcorn, 3.29 Ounce Classic Bag, 3.3 OZ

Orville Redenbacher's Butter Popcorn, 3.29 Ounce Classic Bag, 3.3 OZ

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
486 kcal
100g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
34.3g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
2.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pure Cane Sugar and Orville Redenbacher's Butter Popcorn, 3.29 Ounce Classic Bag, 3.3 OZ side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pure Cane Sugar is the clear winner. With 111 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pure Cane Sugar contains significantly more sugar (100g) compared to the milder Orville Redenbacher's Butter Popcorn, 3.29 Ounce Classic Bag, 3.3 OZ (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Orville Redenbacher's Butter Popcorn, 3.29 Ounce Classic Bag, 3.3 OZ is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pure Cane Sugar or Orville Redenbacher's Butter Popcorn, 3.29 Ounce Classic Bag, 3.3 OZ?

It depends on your goals. Pure Cane Sugar has 375 calories, while Orville Redenbacher's Butter Popcorn, 3.29 Ounce Classic Bag, 3.3 OZ has 486 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pure Cane Sugar vegan?

No, Pure Cane Sugar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pure Cane Sugar and Orville Redenbacher's Butter Popcorn, 3.29 Ounce Classic Bag, 3.3 OZ?

There is a difference of 111 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.