Head-to-Head Analysis

pure dark 85% dark chocolate vs Garden Salsa Sun Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of pure dark 85% dark chocolate

pure dark 85% dark chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Garden Salsa Sun Chips

Garden Salsa Sun Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
642.9 kcal
Energy
494.7 kcal
14.3g
Sugars
7.1g
46.4g
Fat
21.2g
10.7g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing pure dark 85% dark chocolate and Garden Salsa Sun Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

pure dark 85% dark chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 148 more calories per 100g than Garden Salsa Sun Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. pure dark 85% dark chocolate contains significantly more sugar (14.285714285714g) compared to the milder Garden Salsa Sun Chips (7.06713780918728g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Garden Salsa Sun Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? pure dark 85% dark chocolate offers a protein boost with 10.714285714286g per 100g, outperforming Garden Salsa Sun Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: pure dark 85% dark chocolate or Garden Salsa Sun Chips?

It depends on your goals. pure dark 85% dark chocolate has 642.85714285714 calories, while Garden Salsa Sun Chips has 494.69964664311 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is pure dark 85% dark chocolate vegan?

No, pure dark 85% dark chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between pure dark 85% dark chocolate and Garden Salsa Sun Chips?

There is a difference of 148 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.