Head-to-Head Analysis

Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze vs honey bunches of oats

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze

Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of honey bunches of oats

honey bunches of oats

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
390.2 kcal
71.4g
Sugars
22g
0g
Fat
4.9g
0g
Protein
7.3g
0g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze and honey bunches of oats side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze is the clear winner. With 57 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze contains significantly more sugar (71.4g) compared to the milder honey bunches of oats (21.951219512195g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, honey bunches of oats is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze or honey bunches of oats?

It depends on your goals. Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze has 333 calories, while honey bunches of oats has 390.24390243902 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze vegan?

No, Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pure raw & unfiltered california honey -oz squeeze and honey bunches of oats?

There is a difference of 57 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.