Head-to-Head Analysis

PureFoods Chicken Katsu vs Vlasic, stackers, bread & butter pickles imp

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of PureFoods Chicken Katsu

PureFoods Chicken Katsu

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Vlasic, stackers, bread & butter pickles imp

Vlasic, stackers, bread & butter pickles imp

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
296 kcal
Energy
89 kcal
4.2g
Sugars
17.9g
16.9g
Fat
0g
16.9g
Protein
0g
1.5g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing PureFoods Chicken Katsu and Vlasic, stackers, bread & butter pickles imp side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

PureFoods Chicken Katsu is the more energy-dense option here, packing 207 more calories per 100g than Vlasic, stackers, bread & butter pickles imp. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, PureFoods Chicken Katsu takes the lead with only 4.23g of sugar per 100g, whereas Vlasic, stackers, bread & butter pickles imp contains 17.86g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? PureFoods Chicken Katsu offers a protein boost with 16.9g per 100g, outperforming Vlasic, stackers, bread & butter pickles imp in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: PureFoods Chicken Katsu or Vlasic, stackers, bread & butter pickles imp?

It depends on your goals. PureFoods Chicken Katsu has 296 calories, while Vlasic, stackers, bread & butter pickles imp has 89 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is PureFoods Chicken Katsu vegan?

No, PureFoods Chicken Katsu is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between PureFoods Chicken Katsu and Vlasic, stackers, bread & butter pickles imp?

There is a difference of 207 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.