Head-to-Head Analysis

Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag vs Organic Figs

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag

Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic Figs

Organic Figs

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
354.8 kcal
Energy
120 kcal
1.1g
Sugars
23g
3.2g
Fat
0g
9.7g
Protein
2g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag and Organic Figs side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag is the more energy-dense option here, packing 235 more calories per 100g than Organic Figs. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag takes the lead with only 1.12g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Figs contains 23g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag offers a protein boost with 9.68g per 100g, outperforming Organic Figs in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag or Organic Figs?

It depends on your goals. Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag has 354.84 calories, while Organic Figs has 120 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag vegan?

No, Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Quaker de maiz corn tortilla mix ounce paper bag and Organic Figs?

There is a difference of 235 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.