Head-to-Head Analysis

Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon vs Traditional Hummus

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon

Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Traditional Hummus

Traditional Hummus

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
233 kcal
16.1g
Sugars
3.3g
5.4g
Fat
15g
10.7g
Protein
6.7g
0.9g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon and Traditional Hummus side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 142 more calories per 100g than Traditional Hummus. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon contains significantly more sugar (16.07g) compared to the milder Traditional Hummus (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Traditional Hummus is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon offers a protein boost with 10.71g per 100g, outperforming Traditional Hummus in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon or Traditional Hummus?

It depends on your goals. Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon has 375 calories, while Traditional Hummus has 233 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon vegan?

No, Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Quaker oatmeal squares cereal cinnamon and Traditional Hummus?

There is a difference of 142 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.