Head-to-Head Analysis

QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats vs Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats

QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds

Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
90 kcal
2.5g
Sugars
0g
7.5g
Fat
6g
12.5g
Protein
8g
0g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats and Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats is the more energy-dense option here, packing 285 more calories per 100g than Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats contains significantly more sugar (2.5g) compared to the milder Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats offers a protein boost with 12.5g per 100g, outperforming Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats or Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds?

It depends on your goals. QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats has 375 calories, while Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds has 90 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats vegan?

No, QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between QUAKER OATS Quick 1-Minute Oats and Pork Panko Fried Pork Rinds?

There is a difference of 285 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.