Head-to-Head Analysis

Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain vs Everything Bagel Hummus

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain

Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Everything Bagel Hummus

Everything Bagel Hummus

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
267 kcal
2.2g
Sugars
3.3g
6.7g
Fat
20g
13.3g
Protein
6.7g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain and Everything Bagel Hummus side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain is the more energy-dense option here, packing 133 more calories per 100g than Everything Bagel Hummus. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain takes the lead with only 2.22222222222222g of sugar per 100g, whereas Everything Bagel Hummus contains 3.33g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain offers a protein boost with 13.3333333333333g per 100g, outperforming Everything Bagel Hummus in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain or Everything Bagel Hummus?

It depends on your goals. Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain has 400 calories, while Everything Bagel Hummus has 267 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain vegan?

No, Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Quick Cooking Rolled Oats Whole Grain and Everything Bagel Hummus?

There is a difference of 133 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.