Head-to-Head Analysis

Quinoa vs Ancient Grains

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Quinoa

Quinoa

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ancient Grains

Ancient Grains

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
356 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
22.2g
Sugars
0g
5.6g
Fat
2.2g
11.1g
Protein
13.3g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Quinoa and Ancient Grains side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Quinoa is the more energy-dense option here, packing 23 more calories per 100g than Ancient Grains. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Quinoa contains significantly more sugar (22.2g) compared to the milder Ancient Grains (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ancient Grains is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Quinoa or Ancient Grains?

It depends on your goals. Quinoa has 356 calories, while Ancient Grains has 333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Quinoa vegan?

No, Quinoa is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Quinoa and Ancient Grains?

There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.